Visualizzazione post con etichetta Italian course in Italy. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta Italian course in Italy. Mostra tutti i post

martedì 23 giugno 2015

Experiments, cards, and the machinery of narration

Italo Calvino
by Olga Lenczewska



In the late 1960’s and throughout all of 1970’s, Italo Calvino lived in Paris and belonged to a French group of experimental writers called Oulipo. Influenced by its founders, George Perec and Raymon Queneau, who played an important role in the development of the ever-growing structuralism movement, as well as Roland Barthes, whose seminars he attended, Calvino eagerly participated in the creation of new, combinatory, labyrinth-like and reader-oriented literature.

In a lecture entitled “Cybernetics and Ghosts”, Calvino explicitly expressed his fascination with structuralism and semiotics as well as more specific problems within these fields, such as: the importance of the author, the role of the reader, the construction of a narrative, the multiplicity of interpretative possibilities. This focus on the relation of words to each other as well as the relation of words to their meanings had been first analysed by Ferdinand de Saussure, a Swiss linguist, who claimed that our use of language is central to our understanding of the worlds and the events in it, emphasising that it is the very relation of concepts to each other that create the meaning of every one of them by means of “differential relations”. The natural consequence of this observation was the fact that one can only understand a given word or concept if one is familiar with all other elements of the same “system”, that is, in the context of other elements which together constitute a system of communication and conceptual understanding: language. Because literature is created primarily by means of language, the meaning one reads into a text depends heavily on these “differential relations” – not only between single words and concepts, but also between more complex elements that constitute a book, such as single stories, chapters, characters, types of narration, and so on.

Let’s look at how Calvino’s literary experiments in his book “Il castello dei destini incrociati” contributed to the creation of a new type of literature which came from the structuralist movement. “Il castello dei destini incrociati” consists of two quite distinct parts: “Il castello dei destini incrociati” and “La taverna dei destini incrociati”. The two parts are composed in a similar way, both telling stories of different protagonists with a use of a deck of Tarot cards, but the settings and the decks are different in each of the halves, and so are the variations in the cards’ order. The action of both parts takes place in an obscure place and features characters who have just met. All of them have suddenly lost their power of speech and thus struggle to tell the others what has happened to them. Once presented with a deck of Tarot cards, one by one they decide to use it as a means of communication which therefore from now on happens by symbols and images, not words. The narrator, himself a participant in the gathering, attempts to understand the stories they tell (or perhaps interpret them, as we are never sure whether his description is right).

The very idea for the book’s composition came from Paolo Fabbri, who in 1968 delivered a lecture that Calvino attended. However, already in one of his previous works, “Il cavaliere inesistente”, Calvino begins to explore the idea of pictorial, non-linguistic story-telling. Some critics have, in fact, compared “Il castello dei destini incrociati”, to a giant card game, in which both the protagonists and the readers participate. In the book’s first part, the physical arrangements of the cards right before the narrative begins is such that the stories of all the protagonists are reflected by a series of cards, either read horizontally or vertically, either forwards or backwards, which sums up to a total of twelve stories. In the second part of the book the cards are not read sequentially, but in a rather random order.

One of the experiments Calvino put to test in his book was that of narrative units and various ways of combining them. In “Il castello dei destini incrociati”, by constructing different stories on the basis of various order of the Tarot cards, Calvino attempted to prove that a narrative is able to be reduced to a finite number of elements or meaning that can be combined in a infinite number of ways, resulting in infinite narrative solutions. Moreover, by providing the Tarot cards decks on the margins of “Il castello dei destini incrociati”, Calvino ensured that his text would be self-referential. The cards are used as a narrative combinational machine, as the meaning of each of them strictly depends of the card that preceded it and that will follow it. The cards, in reality, have no real existence until given meaning by a player or, in this case, a reader of Calvino’s book, and such meaning can differ, depending on the card’s place in the deck and the story. For example, in the first story of the first part of the book, a card called Strength that depicts a man that beats an animal signifies a knight in a forest who was trapped by a brigand, whereas in the fifth chapter the same cards means an African invasion on Catalonia.

In “Il castello dei destini incrociati” the cards, as units of the system of communication and at the same elements of the story, only gain genuine meaning in relation to each other, as every preceding and following card influences each other. Calvino subverts language, challenging the meaning of its elements, showing us through the use of cards that even if the elements of the communicative system remain the same, their reading and interpretation can constantly change if the relations between the elements change, and so all kinds of stories and meanings can be found the our world, too.

Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it

martedì 26 maggio 2015

“Tante veritá e bugie”: the mysterious affairs of Zeno Cosini

Italo Svevo
by Olga Lenczewska



Zeno Cosini, the main protagonist of Italo Svevo’s novel La coscienza de Zeno, is perhaps one of the most amusing and complex literary characters in modern Italian literature. Whilst telling his story in the first person in a form of a autobiography, as ordered by his psychoanalytic doctor, he manipulates the facts and lies to the reader – or maybe he is not sure himself what happened in reality and what happened in his head. Zeno is the first literary example of Freud’s psychoanalysis, which Svevo was influenced by – yet after having read the novel, one is not sure if psychoanalytic treatment really works.

Already in the opening chapter, Prefazione, written by the psychoanalytist who treated Zenos, the reader is warned about the unreliability of the following Zeno's account of his life. The doctor refers to Zeno's autobiography as a collection of “tante veritá e bugie”, not providing moreover a means of distinguishing between the truths and the lies: “Se [Zeno] sapesse quante sorprese potrebbero risultargli dal commento delle tante veritá e bugie ch'egli ha qui accumulate!”.

Zeno's way of viewing the world results in his alienation from the reality. Every decision he makes is not entirely “his own” but made in order to please somebody else or to falsely appear as a certain personality. This is strengthened when Zeno often visits the Malfenti family. He feels foreign and maladjusted to it, and therefore does or says things he normally would not do or say. As comments a literary critic Vittorini, “Zeno si presenta come lo straniero (xénos) che viene ammesso nel microcosmo del salotto dei Malfenti (un “paese del tutto sconosciuto”)” [Vittorini 2003: 72]. By achieving partial detachment from the society Zeno hopes to escape the social determinism. Yet he does not escape the social determinism but rather follows its norms without consciously deciding to do so or applying a special meaning to them (as for example in the case of the proposal to Augusta). He mimics the behaviours of the others and repeats the schemes of the society: marriage, commerce, family, and death, which are not simply chapters of a book but a thematic autonomy that represents the norms of the society to which Zeno conforms.

I will focus on portraying the protagonist's undecidedness and maladjustment to the society by analysing the reasons for his decision to marry Augusta Malfenti and the general story told in the chapter La storia del mio matrimonio. At the beginning of La storia del mio matrimonio Zeno confesses that “puó perció essere che l'idea di sposarmi mi sia venuta per la stanchezza di emettere e sentire quell'unica nota”. This is clearly not a common reason for wanting to get married, especially as Zeno decides to do so not because of having found the love of his life, but through analysis of the very concept of being a husband. The social normativity and the things that are regarded as “typical”, such as getting married, begin to dominate his own free will and the ability to make responsible decisions based on his own, individual needs. Zeno chose (or was driven into) proposing to one of the Malfenti daughters. This was perhaps the effect of the close bond he had with Giovanni Malfenti. It can be said that the paternal affect of Malfenti which was reciprocated by Zeno was the cause of him wanting to marry one of Malfenti's daughters. He did not so much choose one of them for her own qualities, as for the perspective of having Malfenti as his father-in-law.

Zeno decides to propose to Ada, a woman he truly admires and perhaps is in love with. Yet when she rejects him, he immediately goes on to propose to Alberta and Augusta almost in one go. This grotesque situation – proposing to three sisters at the same evening – is quite amusing to the reader but at the same time reflects a serious problem of Zeno's: the inability to feel something deeply, to be hurt by the rejection of the beloved one, to stop himself from acting without thinking it through first. The act of proposing loses his meaning, or perhaps it is more accurate to say that gains a different one: that of being an element of the social game, of conforming to the norms. In effect, Zeno becomes Augusta's husband without wanting to or loving her. The choice of Augusta, the least appealing of the Malfenti sisters, is portrayed as random and absolutely unpredicted.

Once married, Zeno comes to realise he loves his wife. What he admires in her is the stability of her life and the order she imposes on things. Augusta truly loves Zeno, too, and brings to his life comfort and order; she consoles and absolves him. She is a mother-figure in the book, not only to their children but also to Zeno himself, and in fact she reminds Zeno of his mother. He finds in her something totally opposite to his own character. Augusta has an opposite view on the truth to Zeno. Whilst for the protagonist the semantic meaning of the words alternates from one situation and social context to another, and the truth is often not what actually happened but what Zeno wishes had happened, Augusta is far away from Zeno's truth relativism: “Da ogni sua parola, da ogni suo atto risultava che in fondo essa credeva la vita eterna. Non che la dicesse tale: si sorprese anzi che una volta io, cui gli errori ripugnavano prima che non avessi amati i suoi, avessi sentito il bisogno di ricordargliene la brevitá. Macché! Essa sapeva che tutti dovevano morire, ma ció non toglieva che ormai ch'eravamo sposati, si sarebbe rimasti insieme, insieme”. Moreover, she lives in the tangible reality and controls the present issues whilst Zeno tends to be absent-minded and the major part of his life is happening inside him, in his reflections and analysis, what is reflected by both the novel's title and the dominance of descriptions of his thoughts over dialogues. As a result of this, Zeno and Augusta have two opposite views of the world. Neither changes the other's view. There is a huge distance between the “A” of the Malfenti daughters and the “Z” of Zeno; it represents a distance from the beginning to the end, from a word to a life. Zeno is detached from the reality and lives in his own world of illusion and projection that is more familiar to him than the reality; he views everything that happens through the lens of his desires and wishes.

When Zeno he decides not to tell Carla, his lover, that he actually loves his wife (she thinks he does not), he tries to justify it by saying that in fact he is not sure whether he loves Augusta or not, and that none of the moments he spends with Carla is appropriate to reveal the truth. Similarly, during his affair with Carla he admits that he has more excuses to innocently visit her than needed, admitting thus that the official reasons are just excuses to make love to her, whereas after having ended the relationship he presents himself as a passive victim of circumstances and Carla's seduction, saying that the love for music was the primary rational motive for the many visits he paid her.

In sum, Svevo's La coscienza de Zeno describes a few episodes from the life of a character who is a literary representation of the first generation of people suffering from an existential condition called “life”. He analyses the reality rather than simply lives it, and, consequently, the life he leads conforms more to his own alternations and projections of the reality than the authentic, “objective” world. Thus he is maladjusted to the society he is supposed to function in and every decision he makes is not truly his own, but a means of conforming to the society's norms. The most prominent example of such an act is, as I tried to show, his decision to propose to and marry Augusta, the least appealing of the Malfenti daughters. Zeno is, moreover, unable to face the consequences of his previous decisions (he, for example, repeatedly cheats on his wife) and lies to himself about the morality of his actions.

Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it


venerdì 3 aprile 2015

Studiare l'italiano all'Istituto Europeo a Firenze: l'esperienza di Priscila

Priscila Braco
Priscila, raccontaci da dove vieni, quanti anni hai e cosa fai nella vita.

Mi chiamo Priscila Braco, ho 23 anni e sono brasiliana. Sono nata a San Paolo ma abito a Rio de Janeiro. Mi sono appena laureata in Amministrazione e vorrei partecipare ad un concorso pubblico per lavorare in un ufficio.

Com’è nata questa passione per la lingua italiana? Hai dei parenti italiani?

Il mio bisnonno era italiano, ma questo non è il motivo: conosco già l’inglese e volevo imparare un’altra lingua. Lo spagnolo non mi piace molto, il francese mi piace abbastanza ma l’italiano mi piace di più; mi piace molto il suono. Lo studio da un anno e mezzo.

Cosa ti piace di più dell’Italia?

Il cibo! Ma anche le città: la storia è dappertutto ed in ogni luogo c’è sempre qualcosa da sapere e da imparare. La storia in generale mi piace molto.

E’ la prima volta che vieni in Italia? Cosa ti piace di Firenze?

No, è la terza volta. Ho già visitato altre città ma la cosa che mi piace di Firenze è che si può andare ovunque a piedi, senza bisogno di prendere l’autobus o la macchina. E poi mi piace il fatto che sia piena di luoghi storici. Nonostante ci siano tanti turisti, è una città molto tranquilla dove vivere.

Che corso stai frequentando all’Istituto Europeo?

Sto frequentando un corso intensivo di lingua italiana di 4 settimane. Ho imparato alcune cose di grammatica che ancora non avevo studiato in Brasile, ma principalmente abbiamo fatto tanta conversazione e sono contenta perché non ho occasione di farla in Brasile. La nostra insegnante è stata molto flessibile, ci ha chiesto cosa volevamo migliorare e noi abbiamo chiesto di fare conversazione e lessico.

Hai trovato utile questo corso?

Sì molto. Soprattutto perché in Brasile quando esco dalla lezione parlo portoghese, invece qui in Italia quando finisco la lezione vado al ristorante o a casa e continuo a parlare italiano. Penso che per imparare bene una lingua si debba andare nel Paese in cui è parlata.

Consiglieresti ad un amico di studiare all’Istituto Europeo?

Sicuramente, mi sono trovata bene qui. Però consiglierei di venire per un periodo più lungo, ad esempio 3 mesi. Ho cercato di sfruttare al massimo il tempo, ma penso che 4 settimane siano comunque poche.

Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it

venerdì 13 febbraio 2015

Higher education systems in Italy and England

by Olga Lenczewska

I study Italian and Philosophy at the University of Oxford in the UK, but this year I’ve been spending some time away from the Anglophone world and dreaming spires of Oxford, as a visiting student in Italy at Università degli Studi di Pavia.

It isn’t all that different. Pavia, unlike the majority of Italian universities, has colleges, each of which, just like at Oxford, comprises student accommodation, common rooms, a few lecture halls, a dining hall, and a library. At Oxford or Cambrdge, however, a college is a must, and all of them are academically equal. At Pavia belonging to a college is optional. Even if you do, only four out of eighteen are considered “di merito”, prestigious, because you have to maintain excellent academic results each semester in order to stay in. The two oldest colleges, Borromeo and Ghislieri, in their beauty and traditions resemble the Oxonian colleges.

The higher education system at the two universities is quite different. Pavia doesn’t replicate the famous Oxbridge system, where, apart from lectures and seminars or labs, students have to produce as many as two essays a week and discuss them in one-to-one meetings with a professor. In Pavia, like in the rest Italy, there are no essays or tutorials. Instead, however, the number of lectures per subject per week is much higher than in England. What’s more, Italian students can’t choose what classes they take, whereas in England there’s a lot of flexibility in this respect. We basically study only what we are really interested in, but this means that we can decide to specialise in a certain area very quickly or not to specialise at all.

Moreover, Oxford allows you to study two courses at the same time and, funnily enough, every student has the same amount of work, regardless of whether he/she is doing one or two courses. This means that if you study only one course, you can take more subjects in it. In Italy, on the contrary, it’s impossible to be enrolled in two departments at the same time.

The most dreaded thing amongst students, exams, are organised differently, too. At Pavia, you need to take exams each semester, but their length and form depends on individual professors. At Oxford, we have exams once a year (or ever rarer, depending on the course), but the are all crammed into one or two weeks and organised in a standardised way: for each subject we take a three-hours’ long, essay-based paper. Producing a bachelor thesis isn’t compulsory in England like it is in Italy and, for those who decide to write it, it usually substitutes one of their final exams.

Finally, I find the student life at Oxford much more diversified than in Pavia. Anything you’ve ever dreamed of doing surely exists in Oxford: from crazy Doctor Who societies, salsa classes or Quidditch teams, to more serious political, religious or cultural clubs. But, to even out, Italian students are generally more open and eager to spontaneously make friends on a night out, endlessly walking around the city centre “in giro”. All these differences taken aside, one thing is sure: you’ll never appreciate what your university gives you if you don’t get a chance to study at a different one on your year abroad!

Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it


venerdì 30 gennaio 2015

Florence People: Paolo Di Leo, philosophy professor

Prof. Paolo Di Leo
What does Florence mean for me? Simple things: life, beauty, pleasure, food, wine. Every time I return to Florence I am enchanted by this town. In Singapore, where I teach, life has another style, another pace. Singapore is a modern country without history. I cannot breathe the same atmosphere there that I breathe in Florence. In Florence, history is alive; the memory of princes, duchesses, painters and sculptors is something palpable and accomplishable. In Singapore, I teach philosophy and philosophy of architecture, but I need to leave that city once a year and fly to Florence, which is certainly paradise for someone like me who can't help regenerating in this amazing environment. I originally come from South Italy, Lucania, but when I stay in Florence, I never miss my origins. It's like my real roots are here. Here I find the sameness, the unity of opposites that are daily overpowering my two-world-life, but my hope is to live here for good, one day.


Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it

martedì 27 gennaio 2015

Truth, theatre and reality in Pirandello’s “Sei personaggi in cerca d'autore”

by Olga Lenczewska


In my last article about Pirandello’s “Enrico IV”, I analysed the notions of sanity and madness and illustrated Pirandello’s concept of truth by the vagueness of the distinction between sanity and madness in his “Enrico IV”. This time I will illustrate the concept of truth by the opposition between theatre and reality, which is the main theme of his “Sei personaggi in cerca d’autore”. It is worth reminding the readers what I have already written in my last article, namely, that the theatre conveys always its own version of truth – the one that is true within the newly-created world, and presented as such on stage. In Pirandello's works, the notions of truth and illusion within any play not only constantly intertwine, but intertwine to such an extent that the notion of truth gets lost in the way, and one does not know any more what is an illusion and what is not. 

The opposition between theatre and reality in the light of the notion of truth, that is, the distinction between being a stage character and being a real person, is particularly important for “Sei i personaggi in cerca d'autore”, as this play involves an important meta-theatrical discussion. In “Sei personaggi in cerca d'autore” we are immediately presented with two completely different groups of people: one being the actors and their director, all rehearsing for Pirandello's new play, the second being an odd troupe that interrupts the rehearsal. From the very beginning the “personaggi” appear to contain a paradoxical element in their very essence, as they are presented as being no less real than the actors, but at the same time they are called, look like, and define themselves as characters from a certain play. 

Through introducing them to the “normal” world (in the play represented by the theatre's workers) Pirandello clashes two worlds: the real one and the world of imagination, implying that both are equally authentic and legitimate. What is more, the characters claim to exist outside of their author's head, that is, as beings whose existence does not need to depend on another finite mind: “IL PADRE: (…) la natura si serve da strumento della fantasia umana per proseguire, piú alta, la sua opera di creazione”. The philosopher Roman Ingarden would call their way of living “intentional beings”, because, despite being a work of art, their existence acquired an independent ontological status.

As for the truth of nature and appearance of the six characters, one can argue that because of their masks that impose on them a fixed expression throughout the whole play they do not seem very authentic. But, in my opinion, this is not the case – in fact, the masks intensify the characters' emotions and states of mind, marking what is the most distinct human element. The characters, furthermore, turn out to have an extremely complex set of feeling and relations with one another, thus proving themselves to be more and more real as we read the play. Therefore an important distinction needs to be made: the characters may appear as less real because of their nature, but nevertheless they seem to be more authentic and true than the “normal” people on stage; this view is supported in the play by the Father's words: “a essersi vivi, piú vivi di quelli che respirano e vestono panni! Meno reali, forse; ma piú veri!”. It can be said that, for Pirandello, being “more alive” depends on one's internal complexity, not on the external appearance. Furthermore, he makes a distinction within the very concept of truth between “reale” and “vero”, therefore truth cannot be simply defined as information that conforms to reality but carries its own inner truth. 

The notion of truth in Pirandello's plays is presented as relative. What is and what is not “true” or “real” depends on the readers’ or audience’s viewpoint. Reality gains new conditions: it is authentic actions and feelings of the “personaggi” that make them real, and this beats their fictional character. Perhaps for Pirandello what is “vero” (authentic, true) had more significance than a mere formal status of being “reale” (real).

Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it

venerdì 16 gennaio 2015

Tuscan recipes: Schiacciata alla Fiorentina

Carnival has started! 
Get in the mood with this traditional Florentine cake. It's very easy to prepare and very tasty, especially served with whipped cream or chantilly cream.
Deliziosa, believe us!



Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it

lunedì 12 gennaio 2015

Truth, sanity and madness in Pirandello’s “Enrico IV”

Luigi Pirandello
by Olga Lenczewska


“Truth” is a piece of information with conforms to reality as it is. It is meant to be objective and commonly shared by a large group of people. The opposite of truth is fiction, therefore also any form of art that alters reality, or even goes as far as to create new characters and events, could be called the opposite of truth. Yet, since any author is a creator of a new world that functions within his works, theatre itself conveys always its own version of truth – the one that is true within the newly-created world, and presented as such on stage. In order to follow and understand the spectacle, we must engage in this game. In theatre, therefore, illusion often becomes truth. In Pirandello's works, however, the game goes much farther – the notions of truth and illusion within any play not only constantly intertwine, but intertwine to such an extent that the notion of truth gets lost in the way, and one does not know any more what is an illusion and what is not. The concept of truth in Pirandello’s plays can be illustrated by the vagueness of the distinction between sanity and madness in his “Enrico IV”. 

“Enrico IV” presents a story of a talented actor and historian falls off his horse while playing the role of Henry IV in a historical pageant. After he comes to, he believes himself to be Henry. For the next twenty years, his wealthy nephew, Count de Nolli, funds an elaborate hoax in a remote villa, hiring actors to play the roles of Henry's privy councillors in order to simulate the 11th-century court. In the play the notions of sanity and madness are defined within its frame and laws: we are confronted with a comparison between a theatrical world that resembles ours and anther one with in that does not resemble ours. The first one is represented by all of the “persone” except of Enrico; the latter by Enrico and the theatre-in-theatre, created by others who are aware of the game. Therefore the distinction between madness and sanity seems initially to be marked by the awareness of the game (everyone but Enrico) or by lack thereof (Enrico). 

A scene from Enrico IV
During the first two acts the reader may establish truth as that what the others say, and insanity as Enrico's behaviour. The situation, however, complicates itself to an unbearable extent in the last act when the reader and the other characters find out that Enrico has been aware for eight years that he is not really the German Emperor, and that the has been playing the game with the others, or he has been imposing the rules of his game upon the others who were completely unaware of it. Who appears to be mad at this point? Funnily enough, we are still inclined to say: Enrico, despite the fact that now we know it was him who was aware and the others that were not. But somehow the criterion of madness changes, and Enrico seems to have been mad by letting the game continue and acting as an insane person. Was this a mad decision? We are inclined to say it was, but nevertheless the definition of insanity is being substantially altered. Finally, it is altered once more at the very end of the play when Enrico, having unveiled the truth about himself to everyone's bewilderment, has a change to appear as sane, and in fact is considered as such by some characters, for example Belcredi: “BELCREDI: (…) Tu non sei pazzo!”. Enrico, however, immediately denies this, shouting “Non sono pazzo? Eccoti!”, and kills Belcredi. This decision seems to have been made by him in order to prove a point, but we get a feeling that a sane person would never kill somebody just to prove a point. 

Is Enrico really mad for doing so? And, is he still mad, or is he mad again but in a different way now? Clearly the definition of madness as well as the demarcation line between sanity and insanity become extremely vague at this point, and much is left to the reader's interpretation and speculation. But that is precisely what Pirandello wants: to leave the search for the truth to the readers; this is the final part of the game. In my opinion, at the end of the play Enrico himself doubts whether he is mad or not, but his decision to kill Belcredi has consequences, and he has to act as mad again (“Ora sí... per forza... qua insieme, qua insieme... e per sempre!”), which is inevitable in the light of his previous decision. The notion of truth seems relative and its objectivity hidden to us (as well as some characters). 

The notion of truth in Pirandello's plays is presented as relative. “Enrico IV” introduces so many dimensions that it is virtually impossible to answer, on the objective grounds, the question which of the characters are sane and which are mad. The truth, therefore, becomes a strongly relative concept, or, to put it differently, the objective truth is hidden from the audience (and some characters as well), and what remains visible are just certain viewpoints or perspectives of the theatrical reality. Which scenario is the true one or which characters are real and sane is never explicitly sad, and thus the truth is always hidden from the reader. Moreover, it can be questioned whether a fixed truth even exists in the plays – where would it be? I see no space within which it could exist – it cannot be found in the texts, implicitly or explicitly, and there are many plausible interpretations of what has really happened to the characters before the play. But pondering it might turn out to be useless, as the characters did not exist before the play and, after all, they are mere creations of the author.

Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it

lunedì 5 gennaio 2015

Epifania 2015 in Florence

Also this year Florence celebrates Epifania with the historical parade “CAVALCATA DEI MAGI”.
Below the program in detail:

11.00 AM, in front of the Duomo (Cathedral): “Presepe vivente” (Nativity scene)

2:00 PM, in Piazza Pitti: Renaissance dances by Associazione Culturale Contrada Alfiere

2:00 PM: the parade leale from Piazza Pitti

Itinerary: Piazza Pitti, Via Guicciardini, Ponte Vecchio, Via Por Santa Maria, Via Lambertesca, Loggiato degli Uffizi, Piazza della Signoria, Via Calzaiuoli, Piazza Duomo

2:10 PM,  in Piazza del Duomo: Christmas carols by  “Piccolo Coro Melograno”

3:00 PM, in Piazza della Signoria: Corteo storico della Repubblica fiorentina joins the parade
 
3:30 PM: arrival in Piazza del Duomo

Presentation of the offers of the Magi to baby Jesus

Speech of Franco Lucchesi,  President  of Opera di Santa Maria del Fiore

Reading of the passage of the Holy Bible about the Magi

Greeting of S. E. Cardinale Giuseppe Betori

venerdì 5 dicembre 2014

At Christmas give yourself a dream. Study Italian




5 good reasons to study Italian:

1. You will learn a lot of words used for food, arts and fashion
2. You will be able to communicate with Italians in a short time
3. Italian is not only a language, it's a way of living: discover it
4. Italian is the language of love and beauty par excellence
5. Around 145 millions people speak Italian in the world


Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it


martedì 2 dicembre 2014

Travelling as a way of living, trilingualism as a way of communicating with the world

I at Angkor, Cambodia
by Olga Lenczewska


During the last three years I have been constantly living between three countries: Poland, the United Kingdom, and Italy. A few years ago, when I was in high school, I also spent one year living in the United States. I don’t use the word “abroad” anymore, because it simply doesn’t mean anything specific for me. When asked to provide my address on a document, I always hesitate, unsure which one of the three I’ve got to write down. Same thing with my phone number. 

How has it all started? No, my parents aren’t diplomats. Neither is my family multinational. They’re both Polish and it is in Poland that I spent my early and adolestent life. By applying to study in a foreign country for a course with a compulsory year abroad in yet another country I chose to lead a different life myself. Maybe precisely because I wasn’t “born into” a multicultural and multilingual life I have so much to say on why I appreciate it and how travelling like this changes you completely.

Despite living between three countries already, I travel to others whenever time and money allow me to. Last year I have been to Hungary, Holland, Spain, and Germany, and this year to Thailand, Malaysia, and Cambodia. I currently live in Pavia, but since September I have already managed to visit friends in Oxford and Warsaw. I have been on nine flights since September alone. I’m going back to Poland for Christmas and then in January I’m flying to Morocco with a friend, after which I have to move to Rome for another half a year, probably visiting friends in France and England in the meantime. In June I want to go to China for two months, then back to Poland for the rest of summer holidays, and finally back to Oxford to complete my Bachelor degree in Modern Languages and Philosophy.

The multicultural aspect of Oxford - my university town - allowed me to make friends with people from around the world, which suddenly became smaller than it appeared before. Oxford is a minature of the whole earth, representing its cultural, religious, and linguistic variety in a way which forces you to embrace it, not approach it with indifference. But it doesn’t mean Oxford made me want to be a tourist. I don’t like the word “tourist”. It carries an assumption that you go somewhere, use expensive facilities and live in posh hotels, sightseeing the most obvious attractions with a guide’s aid. In all of that gets lost what for me is the essence of travelling, and in all of that it is virtually impossible to witness the authentic culture and customs of a place. And, yes, whilst when travelling privately or even on your own you can sometimes find yourself in places you don’t feel safe in and see one cockcoach too many, believe me, it’s worth it.

A Buddhist temple in Bangkok
When I go abroad - wherever “abroad” is at the moment - I consider it not only a chance to see new places, but above all an opportunity to learn new ways of living, understand other cultural heritages, and become a wiser person by comparing what I see now to what I lived around before. During the days when I visit a place I’ve previously not been to, I feel happiness that I don’t experience otherwise. Sometimes a new city appeals to me to such an extent that I want to shout “I’m going to live here one day!” and there would be nothing wrong with this had it not been for the fact that I shout this way too often. Whilst I can’t live in all these paces simultaneously, I can visit them from time to time, and whilst some destinations remain my future home only in my dreams, there are a few countries where I really feel at home.

But travelling so often, despite what you may think, did not only make me “lose” my one home that I once had. It also, and more importantly, made me understand in which ways I’m Polish (and always be Polish not matter where I am) and, on a bigger scale, in which ways I’m European. If you travel around your continent, your cultural perspective broadens to the extent that you’re able to understand yourself in the wider context of the whole continent. When you travel to different continents, however, your cultural perspective broadens even further and you begin to understand yourself in the context of the whole world. That’s because it is only when facing something different and unfamiliar that you’re able to fully understand yourself. Making this realisation happen is the most exciting thing you can chose to do with your life.

Lastly, there’s one thing which changed me even more than having lived in four countries: having become trilingual. I use the word “trilingual” is a loose sense, because I’m not, of course, properly trilingual. I do nevertheless speak fluently (and think and dream in) English, Polish, and Italian, or preferably speak a combination of these if the linguistic skills of my conversational partner permit me. Much have been said about the effects of multilingualism on people, but I consider worth mentioning just one thing: speaking a few languages fluently is the thing that surprises me in myself the most. Sometimes my mind suddently switches to another language without an obvious reason, and witnessing this “from the inside” is baffling. But one drawback of this fact is that whenever I speak with someone who doesn’t know all three of these languages (that is, around 95% of my interlocutors), I feel as though a part of me cannot be understood or expressed and I have to be careful in which tongue I formulate my thoughts. When I find someone who speaks all three of them, however, there’s no fun beyond starting a sentence in one language and finishing it in another, or worrying that I cannot find a word for something in one tongue, because I can just express what I want to in any linguistic form that I know.

I’m not sure where I’m going to live when (if?) I finally settle down. But this uncertainty doesn’t terrify me. On the contrary, it feels quite exciting. After all, I’ve got all the necessary tools to be able to consciously choose where I want to spend the rest of my life. And with friends all around the world, I will be able to travel without feeling like an intrusive tourist even when I settle down.

Floating market in Thailand

Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it


lunedì 10 novembre 2014

Lavorare all'Istituto Europeo: l'esperienza di Ilaria

Ilaria, segretaria all'Istituto Europeo
Lavorare all’Istituto Europeo è davvero una sfida.

Ogni giorno mi dedico soprattutto al problem solving, che è una delle attività tipiche di una scuola come la nostra, la più difficile ma forse anche la più remunerante.

E’ bello vedere le facce sorridenti e soddisfatte degli studenti una volta che li hai aiutati nei loro piccoli (e talora grandi) problemi quotidiani. E’ una grande ricompensa. La più grande.

Il contatto quotidiano con studenti che vengono da ogni parte del mondo è un altro aspetto interessante di questo lavoro.

Io non viaggio moltissimo ma forse proprio a causa del mio lavoro, stando a contatto con tutto il mondo, il mondo viene da me. Imparo moltissimo dalle diverse mentalità degli studenti che incontro ogni giorno.

Un bel lavoro non c’è che dire!


Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it

giovedì 30 ottobre 2014

Being an Italian Language Teacher

Being an Italian language teacher is one of the most beautiful jobs ever. It puts you in contact with the whole world, both young and older people. It opens new horizons. It makes you travel just staying in a classroom.

What makes a teacher a good teacher of Italian language?

1) passion
2) smile
3) being communicative
4) being able to psych up
5) proficiency
6) professionalism

This is the perfect recipe. This is the real portrait of a dynamic and qualified teacher who loves the most beautiful job in the world!


Contact us! info@istitutoeuropeo.it - www.istitutoeuropeo.it